Their basic problem is that they're not building a proper multi-tennant infrastructure, it's still just a bunch of servers that they run instead of you. They still need to have scheduled down-time to patch and update them. Contrast this with Google's approach which is fully resilient and doesn't require and scheduled down-time at all.
I think the choice is clear.
1 comment:
So, Google hasn't had any outages then, right?
Wrong.
Maybe the choice isn't as clear as you claim.
Post a Comment